Sheffield Wednesday owner Dejphon Chansiri’s current standing with the EFL’s Owners’ and Directors’ Test may now be exclusively revealed by EFL Analysis.
The EFL has imposed an embargo on Sheffield Wednesday because owner Dejphon Chansiri neglected to pay his employees and players in May.
As a result, Sheffield Wednesday‘s staff has taken on emergency finance; nonetheless, the Owls will face further sanctions if the money is not received within the next two weeks.
Despite significant indications that the enterprises had previously been associated with the club, it was revealed on Monday that Chansiri had been disowned by John West and the Thai Union Group (TUG).
Given Wednesday’s chaos, we asked Adam Williams, our resident finance expert, to provide Chansiri’s current standing on the EFL Owners’ and Directors’ Test.
Why Dejphon Chansiri, the owner of Sheffield Wednesday, was not expelled by the EFL
We disclosed last week that Chansiri may be banned by the EFL if he were to undergo the Owners’ and Directors’ Test again.
However, Williams asserts that there must be a valid basis to expel someone, and that the EFL is essentially limited in what they may do under this standard.
For this reason, Williams told EFL Analysis, there are simply no grounds to dismiss Chansiri within the text of the law.
He said that the EFL’s options under the Owners’ and Directors‘ Test were somewhat limited.
Since some of his creditors have not made their payments, Chansiri will likely claim that he has no control over the late wage payment issue, which he would likely attribute to cash flow problems.
“I believe we’ll have to assume that they are citing mitigating circumstances until we hear from the EFL or Wednesday themselves.
“Dai Yongge was in the courts because of his debts in China when he was disqualified in April. We just don’t know Chansiri’s current circumstances, but I am aware that there are powerful individuals in the area on Wednesday who are trying to dismantle his economic empire.
Therefore, there are no legal grounds for his expulsion. The EFL will need to reevaluate it if his solvency changes in the future. However, he—or any other owner—would need to have committed a crime or be incapable of carrying out his long-term responsibilities to the club.
“The Owners’ and Directors’ Test has no moral component. You cannot evict someone because you believe they are a nasty person or a lousy owner. There must be a legitimate justification for doing so, supported by evidence. Wednesday supporters are quite irritated, but that is the way things stand.
Why administration is Sheffield Wednesday’s best option
Wednesday supporters will be upset that, in spite of everything the owner has done to the football team, there is no reason to kick him out.
However, financial analyst Rob Wilson believes that administration is the “best outcome” for Sheffield Wednesday given the Owls’ three-window transfer embargo and the potential for a points loss.
Wilson stated that the government may see some important assets discounted or sold under duress, while pointing to financial instability.
“In reality, the procedure would allow SWFC to reset its financial obligations, allow the EFL to step in and assist with the sale process, and obtain a new degree of ownership or investment that stabilises the club over the medium term.”
Since proponents ultimately want Chansiri to be as far away from Hillsborough as possible, a potential administration would expedite the process.
Read more at;https://www.sportupdates.co.uk
Leave a Reply