Multiple parties attempting to generate interest in the purchase of a £7.4 million debt owed by Sheffield Wednesday have been unsuccessful, according to The Star, with the likely outcome of the debt’s payment deadline still unknown.
A charge against Hillsborough Stadium owned by the club to a lender named New Avenue Projects has been rolled over with interest on an annual basis since it appeared on Companies House in 2020. On those five occasions, the debt’s cost has increased from roughly £6.3 million. It arrived in the months following the contentious sale of the stadium to Sheffield 3, a third-party corporation owned by Owls chairman Dejphon Chansiri, however the Thai has stated on record that it is a historical debt incurred prior to his ownership of the club.
The Star reported earlier this month that there was reason to believe the club had been informed that a big portion of the loan would not be carried over as has been customary, and Chansiri would be asked to return a substantial seven-figure sum. The current debt payment deadline is today, September 30, but it has been revealed that a grace period would be allowed on any enforcement action if the payment is not made on time. According to the Star, the grace period lasts seven days.
As reported earlier this month, some of the more stringent enforcement actions the lender could take in the event of nonpayment could include putting the club into administration or appointing a receiver over Hillsborough, who would have the authority to demand rent from the club or eventually sell the stadium. If both of these possibilities are pursued at the same time, an expert suggests that an insolvency practitioner be recruited to oversee the sale of both the club and the stadium as a whole.
It is vital to note that any live demand may be subject to revision at any time, as understood or negotiated between the parties. The lender’s willingness to take enforcement action in the case of late payment is unknown, and the terms of the debt rollover may eventually be negotiated or reconsidered.
Attempts to stimulate interest in acquiring the debt were unsuccessful
With the necessary covenants and debt handover structure, this might, in theory, have allowed its owner to eventually assume control of the club and/or sell it for a profit on their investment after running it in the interim term. The Star knows that some brokers and other individuals have been operating independently of both the Sheffield Wednesday and New Avenue Projects. Any potential debt purchase agreement would have to be negotiated with New Avenue Projects.
Despite receiving initially positive responses from potential investors, the parties The Star is aware of have been unable to secure immediate material interest in purchasing the debt ahead of the deadline, with investors citing the business uncertainty and volatility of any longer-term process as a factor, as well as the limited time frame remaining in which to conduct appropriate due diligence.
Uncertainty about where things go from here
Where this leaves the likely material situation of debt repayment is unknown. This week, Wednesday notified its employees that they should not expect full payment of their September salaries today, their regular payday, with backroom personnel, academy figures, and non-footballing staff receiving only £1,000 of their projected earnings. Senior players were informed not to expect rapid payment at all, and a timeframe for meeting salary requirements was not provided due to a lack of information from the top.
The club’s overall financial outlook remains bleak, with five active EFL registration embargoes in place for misdemeanours such as non-payment of monies owed to clubs for previous transfer deals, outstanding payments owed to HMRC, and monies owed to other football creditors. So far, Chansiri has been unable to demonstrate to the authority his ability to fund the team for the duration of the season.
With previous attempts to promote the acquisition of stadium debt ineffective, it is unclear what appetite New Avenue Projects may have for enforcement action on Wednesday if ultimate payment obligations are not fulfilled. Little is known about New Avenue Projects, its conditions, or the level of incentive for a strict enforcement action.
Events in recent months are thought to have raised serious concerns about the security of payments owing to creditors, resulting in the implied demand for payback, however The Star believes New Avenue Projects has no interest in taking over ownership of the club.
Any strict enforcement action might be time-consuming and costly. If the demands are carried out and Wednesday is unable to meet them, the ball appears to be in the hands of New Avenue Projects and/or additional negotiations between the two sides.
Leave a Reply